Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novasophy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 12:24, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Novasophy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not asserted as a movement but rather as a definition WP:WINAD. I haven't found a single reputable source with information on the term (just an "Executive Search enterprise software" of the same name Noahhoward (talk) 05:00, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 January 11.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 05:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete This should have been a PROD, but since we're here, delete as WP:NEO article clearly intended to use Wikipedia to spread usage of the term. Bakazaka (talk) 05:54, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as is a dictionary definition. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:05, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as dictdef at best. --Lockley (talk) 04:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.