Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novato Flatiron Building


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) KSAWikipedian (talk) 01:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Novato Flatiron Building

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet GNG. Searching confirms it exists and is just called the "Flatiron Building" in Novato, California. The are a few brief mentions in local Novato history sites that say no more than is in the article and repeat what is on the video used as the source in the article. Lack of in-depth coverage in multiple RS. MB 19:11, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and California. MB 19:11, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

NOTE Renamed Flatiron Building (Novato, California)


 * Keep - Found references in Daily Independent Journal (San Rafael, CA) 1958 1958 1974, as well as one in a book Page 258.Nweil (talk) 19:33, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * "a church is having an event in the Flatiron building"
 * "a grand opening will be held for the church's thrift shop in the Flatiron building"
 * a photo with a caption repeating some of the basic facts in the article
 * a short paragraph in a Marin County travel/guidebook
 * None of this is WP:SIGCOV MB 20:30, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * There was a historical reflection on it in the Sacramento Bee in 2015. Market opening article in 1918. The article can certainly be improved but it passes based on what I see.Nweil (talk) 23:21, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I looked for sources and not much. Those given above look ok, not great, but enough. Oaktree b (talk) 23:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * NOTE Renamed Flatiron Building (Novato, California) Djflem (talk) 06:06, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep satisfies GNG. Djflem (talk) 06:07, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep It has been updated and it complies with GNG now. Not to mention that it is a historical building, having been designated so by the City of Novato. AnonymousEditor95 (talk) 21:39, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep This building is notable, and the sourcing is ample and proper.TH1980 (talk) 00:18, 28 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.