Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novemthree Siahaan (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 11:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Novemthree Siahaan
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm not at all convinced by the keep votes in the previous nomination. now that time has passed surely this comes under WP:ONEVENT? LibStar (talk) 03:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  cab (talk) 03:14, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect: Also redirect for Noventri Siahaan. - BalthCat (talk) 06:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * redirect to? LibStar (talk) 06:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I read the past noms and went to comment without realising there was no context. Merge and redirect to Gigantiform cementoma. - BalthCat (talk) 08:45, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:42, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:34, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep ONEVENT doesn't apply, this is about his whole life. And there is certainly enough coverage to establish notability.  It easily survived an earlier AFD, let's not waste time rehashing.Matchups 12:45, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. mymultiplesclerosis.co.uk does not appear to be a reliable source. Other than that, there are a fair few mentions on a general search, but couldn't find reliable coverage. Does not appear to have been written about in medical journals. gnews doesn't give anything decent (only a user submitted review of the tv program). Not everyone who has appeared on a tv show is notable. The previous debate does not seem to be of the highest quality, so I wouldn't set too much store by that. Would not particularly object to a redirect to Gigantiform cementoma. Quantpole (talk) 13:39, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't see one event as applying. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 11:45, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.