Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novgorodsko-Sofiysky Svod


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Novgorodsko-Sofiysky Svod

 * – ( View AfD View log )
 * - Lom Konkreta (talk) 03:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * - Lom Konkreta (talk) 03:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Article on a rather esoteric historic "source". The article labels it as a "tentative" name for the document. It seems the matter isn't settled yet, and therefore may not be appropriate for a WP article. Snotty Wong  confabulate 22:46, 27 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * keep Indeed it is a rather esoteric subject, for an average wikipedian. So what? The term is quite common in Russian historiography (you have to google the Russian term; I added the corresponding "Find sources" above, and you will readily see 120 book hits). The matter is quite settled. The name is tentative because the document is hypothetical. However this is not a reason for deletion, since we don't delele, say, Proto-Indo-European language. Lom Konkreta (talk) 03:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge or rather redirect to Novgorod Fourth Chronicle. This article seems to ahve not content that does not also appear in that article, which is also little more than a stub.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *poke* 01:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per Lom Konkreta and WP:POTENTIAL. The article could use some serious attention from someone who understands Russian, but that's no reason to delete it. YardsGreen (talk) 09:54, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.