Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NovoLogic.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 09:17, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

NovoLogic.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Spam article created by firm's publicist ("media specialist" -- see ). No evidence the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Notable clients does not make a company notable. -- Rrburke (talk) 18:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: ....an online local marketing, communications, consulting, training, Elearning and interactive agency  that provides services to its clients in the areas of digital advertising, content creation, media buying, strategic counsel, analytics, technology and user experience, and if you are feeling somewhat glassy eyed you are not alone. References supplied are to blogs or announcements of product.  No relevant Google News archive hits. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 00:02, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Effectively no coverage, creator's an SPA. Can't establish notability. (Just poking around, it looks like he just built the page in his userspace. Creator also mentioned "...the article I was building for Aretta Communications...". Spam spam spam.) OSbornarfcontributionatoration 00:45, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.