Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call I Wanna Rock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 15:48, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Now That's What I Call I Wanna Rock

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete. Previously deleted in a bundle nom with Now That's What I Call R&B in July here. The album has received little to no significant coverage except for a press release that was copied to a couple of websites. As opposed to most Now releases with an article (at least in the US), I cannot find any review of the album (even on Allmusic) or record of it charting which could qualify it as receiving "significant coverage". Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 07:15, 6 September 2011 (UTC)


 * It should be noted it is no longer a Wal-Mart exclusive. Amazon.com and other sites also sell the album(s) as well. Most songs listed on the album have indeed charted, although it is accurate that no 'signifiant' critic has reviewed this particular album. It is nominated to stay because it is a Rock-based genre album, which is substantially different than most of the other US Series albums, which are Pop, R&B and Dance. The R&B edition is not signigicantly different because most of the songs on prior albums in the US Series contain R&B songs. Rock is generally not included on the numbered albums in the series. Thebog1984 (talk) 09:25, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The songs on the album charted well before the release of the album and are completely independent of the album itself. The genre of the album, the songs on the album, and its availability at Walmart or Amazon are not what makes it notable; it is coverage in reliable sources that do. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 09:48, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Eh, whatever. If I'm the only person in the world who thinks it should be on Wikipedia, then feel free to click the delete button. I go for systematic completeness. E.G., most of the US Series albums are listed in entirety, it's the opinion of this user that it would be appropriate to ensure it's completeness but *shrug* one person's thoughts do not make it so. S'all good. :) Thebog1984 (talk) 21:24, 6 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not only was the article deleted in a prior AfD, but the recreated text is still in the same condition it was after that AfD; there is nothing in the article to indicate that the album is any more notable now than it was then. That said, there is no coverage of the album in reliable sources, so the album fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG. —C.Fred (talk) 14:32, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.