Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call Music! 26 (U.S. series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Majorly   (hot!)  20:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Now That's What I Call Music! 26 (U.S. series)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

It's too soon to have this article up. Chris9086 07:04, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, too soon, no useful information. Dar-Ape 02:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 09:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Nothing in WP:MUSIC agrees with a justification for removal, and it's common practice for spectulative information to be placed in preperation for a pending release as long as the relevant template is placed at the top of the page. Thewinchester (talk) 14:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment All right, I have two problems with this article. The first one is that right now Now Volume 25 still has not been released. What is the hurry to post an article about 26? Do we need an article on a music compilation that may not be out for another year? Also, where is this information coming from? There are not any sources listed. I would say delete because of WP:VERIFIABILITY, but eventually the article will have to be written. It will be released someday. But, I do have to agree with Thewinchester nothing in WP:MUSIC says that there cannot be an article about a CD that will be released. Perhaps next time we could wait until closer to release date before creating the article. -- Cy ru s      An dir on   15:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator; it's too soon for this page to exist. As Cyrus Andiron said, Now That's What I Call Music! 25 isn't even out yet; I don't think this article is needed yet. Acalamari 22:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination, and the very nature of the article's content - I suspect "These tracks are songs that are speculated to be on this album by fans" fails WP:A at most levels. Bob talk 21:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.