Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now and instant

Original research related to author's musings in the Journal of Theoretics. --Diberri | Talk 22:14, Aug 31, 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete Lacrimosus 22:35, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC).
 * Delete. Original research bordering on nonsense. There is no "I" in Wikipedia...er, well, there's an "i"...or a few actually...dangit, you know what I mean!   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 23:28, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. He's a serial offender - see histories of Transduction, Matter, Electric Field, etc. -- Tantalate 01:46, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: So, like, now is, like, not really now at all, because, like, now is already gone when I say "now," so, like, um, there is no now now, only the eternal now that's, like, um, some chemicals, man, and, like, if you could, like, get those chemicals and stuff, you know, you could, like, get into eternity and all, and, like, live forever!  (Original research.) Geogre 02:35, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Well, perhaps... Better get a well-known encyclopedic definition of those terms. It ought to be sustained by data on biophysical and physical properties of the fastest enzyme and femtosecond-light-pulse Nobel-prize-winning photos of a bond breaking in an exploding molecule. The article should also make known that every percept must be erased to allow the following one to be perceived, in all of the five senses. If you cannot, then perhaps, er... the article should be let be, with a commentary on its originality. -- Ghitis 08:19, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete rhyax 14:39, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete john k 05:42, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pyrop 22:17, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)