Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nowhere girls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:05, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Nowhere girls

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

article is written to legitimize this term, making it seem its use is widespread. there isn't even a chinese wikipedia article about this term. search up "沒女", most results (and most sources in the article) are about the tv show 没女大翻身. ltb d l (talk) 08:53, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, China, Hong Kong, South Korea,  and Taiwan.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  10:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep for now: Could the nominator clarify what is the rationale for deletion? The Wen Wei Po, U Beauty, and the South China Morning Post sources currently in the article may not be the best, but already demonstrate that the term exists and is notable enough to pass GNG. In addition to these sources, a simple search has provided me with numerous other sources, including some Chinese sources that document the origin of this term (see Economic Daily and The Sun), how it spread to and became popular in Hong Kong (see Hong Kong Economic Journal, Wen Wei Po, and She.com), as well as the subsequent social influence and some recurring usages after it gained popularity (see BBC, Ming Pao, HK01, and Oriental Daily News). I have not yet looked for academic sources, but I have already come across two academic journal articles that cover this term when I was searching for media sources ( and ), so I do not believe academic sources would be difficult to locate either. :The fact that it does not currently have a respective article on the zhwiki means nothing, and it is clearly an argument of WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST. Most of the sources mention the TV show Nowhere Girl is understandable, because that show popularised the term. There are many other instances of the term being used, such as the drama series The No No Girl (全職沒女), the film Love Detective (沒女神探), and a non-fiction book Mei nü Yao Fan Shen (沒女要翻身) written by Queenie Chan (television host), where the English translation of the term may differ. So the claim that the term is only used in one particular TV show is false as well. Could the nominator please elaborate a bit more on the specific rationale being used for deletion? — Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ）  15:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Since about a week has passed but the nominator did not further elaborate on the deletion rationale, the current nomination statement is based on WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST instead of notability guidelines, and I think it should be considered Speedy Keep per WP:CSK#1. — Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ）  07:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Keep per the excellent research by, who has definitively shown that the topic passes Notability. Cunard (talk) 10:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen&times; &#9742;  16:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per clear pass on WP:LASTING which is usually the death of flash-in-the-pan neologisms - the originating influence is from 2001, and I am satisfied that the articles posted by Prince of Erebor are sufficiently far apart that this is a notable concept. BrigadierG (talk) 00:00, 3 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.