Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nowthatsfuckedup.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 11:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Nowthatsfuckedup.com
Non-notable web site Mhking 02:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. While the website isn't extremely notable on its own right, it would appear to meet WP:WEB based on the two news articles that reference it. --Brad Beattie (talk) 03:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This was notable at the time. Daniel Case 04:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - but expand; There was quite a bit of controversy about this in FL, which reached internationally becuase of explicit pictures of military personnel; this site was apparently banned by branches of the US military, and then closed down by the FL sheriff's dept. That should probably be documented in the article. SkierRMH 04:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree the news articles on the topic make it pass WP:WEB TSO1D 04:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, I added specific information on the court case. --Dhartung | Talk 07:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. ~ EdBoy[c] 19:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Well, it has sources to pass WP:WEB and it has an intriguing history.-- danntm T C 19:58, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. ← A NAS  Talk? 21:23, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep site continues to generate media coverage more than a year after closure. --Whiskey Pete 23:53, 29 December 2006
 * Keep per above.  Buck  ets  ofg  01:26, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * keep per above --BenWhitey 03:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. The case was fairly notable, plenty of sources to document that.--Media anthro 12:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Well sourced seems to meet WP:WEB. Hello32020 01:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.