Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nox (platform)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Software-defined networking. Liz Read! Talk! 04:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Nox (platform)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Speedy was just declined (courtesy, so we're here. It's a copy paste from the source which was present in the first version so there's nothing to revert to and no indication the text was released under an applicable license. I'm unable to find sufficient sourcing on which to build even a stub following rev del. Star   Mississippi  19:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Any more editors want to weigh in here? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  19:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: There seems to be a lot of reliable sources on this subject when searched for  "Nox" platform SDN  on google books, scholar and I believe the platform was/is used widely. If someone can ping a subject matter expert, it would be useful to evaluate the sources. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge/Redirect to Software-defined networking. As the nom notes, the existing content is both confusing and a copyvio.  But there does seem to be enough coverage of this software to keep a redirect.  Perhaps the current one-sentence mention of it is sufficient; the Software-defined networking article has a lot of content problems of its own. Walsh90210 (talk) 02:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Nom comment fine with this. I do think the text should be rev-del'ed if the article itself isn't deleted before the redirect. Star   Mississippi  02:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.