Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nsofwa Petronella Sampa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Strong consensus that ongoing notability was established (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:40, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Nsofwa Petronella Sampa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable activist nothing significant from the references provided. PK YellowWisdom (talk) 11:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I have edited the article to bring her education and career more up to date. I have included a couple more references, one from the US Embassy in Zambia, which do not add much more to the extensive coverage in the 3 sources that had already been included. As those 3 articles were entirely about the subject, date from 2014-2018, are from two independent sources and 3 different journalists, I believe that she does meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. As she is young, and working with young people, much of her activism is through sources which Wikipedia does not consider reliable (eg Facebook) - however, she has received significant coverage from mainstream media. RebeccaGreen (talk) 16:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:37, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:37, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:37, 18 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep For now, per RebeccaGreen. Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 22:55, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Significant coverage over time means she passes GNG. I also deorphaned the article. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 04:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep the article references several mainstream media articles directly about the subject. Notability was solidly proven even at the time of nomination, the nomination has no validity. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:30, 24 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.