Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nth Floor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Nth Floor

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Only mentions online are promotional primary sources, or barely mention it in articles about Microsoft's VR aims more broadly. Creator has acknowledged COI, but I still don't think this project meets GNG. BrigadierG (talk) 16:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:56, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  Just ' i ' yaya  16:10, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Just ' i ' yaya  16:10, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:PROMO grounds; the writing is like a CES rundown on a morning show and is only a concept, not built out at all. File:Nthfloor-art.jpg is well past the deletion date on Commons and should be taken care of.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 22:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * better references / news have been added this is a solution used for 675,000 employees and his been widely referenced in the news, its not a promotion excessive company mentioning has been removed media source details have been added. additional facts e.g. 60,000 VR Quest 2 headset deployments have been added to show the scale of the solution as a first of its kind in the metaverse BenHolfeld — Preceding undated comment added 19:28, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete -- I think this may fail WP:ADMASQ. Caleb Stanford (talk) 02:03, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I came across it a few weeks ago and the tone weirded me out until I realized a COI wrote the bulk of it. I would consider it a self-promo, even if it has coverage. Some passing mention might be made in metaverse alongside Facebook's own dystopian work hellscape platform, but beside that, nothing comes to mind. SWinxy (talk) 12:38, 8 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.