Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NuLiv Science


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:30, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

NuLiv Science

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to pass our general notability guidelines. All sources I could find were press releases and overviews of the company, making them unreliable. RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録 15:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not only about a non-notable company, but also unacceptably promotional, though not quite enough so (in my opinion) for speedy deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:49, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:49, 14 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Unable to locate anything in-depth with a search of Google Search, News, or Books. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete – Promotional article with no sufficient independent coverage, written by a single purpose account, likely involved in a conflict of interest. — Paleo  Neonate  – 22:49, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:46, 15 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.