Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nu Gamma Psi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete partly because there is consensus that the organisation does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for an article in the encyclopedia and partly because it is a blatant copyright infringement. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:39, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Nu Gamma Psi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete nn fraternity. All references are self-published, and largely incomprehensibel Mayalld (talk) 15:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:43, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - fraternities must meet WP:ORG and this one doesn't. TerriersFan (talk) 18:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. LK (talk) 10:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 *  Delete  No evidence of notability; material appears self-published. Also links don't seem to work, so its not possible to get even the slightest verification for this. Locke9k (talk) 22:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete! Entire page is copyright violation from their fraternity webpageLocke9k (talk) 23:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I have posted the copyright violation notice at the top of the page, blanking the contents. Its clearly copyvio, no question.  If it wasn't already in AFD I would nominate for speedy deletion, but I'm not sure if doing both will cause problems so I will leave it to an admin. Locke9k (talk) 23:07, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.