Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuala Mole


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw talk 19:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Nuala Mole

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionably notable as there hasn't been much change and the best links I found was this and this so unless this can actually be better improved, there's not much to suggest keeping as it seems it may have been started by Nuala Mole herself (SPA author was "Londonlawyer"). Pinging tagger. SwisterTwister  talk  06:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete The article itself sounds entirely self-promotional and seems to have been derived from Mole's bio on her organisation's webpage. As for notability, there is some content by her (she has authored some publications ) but not so much about her. Little evidence of notablility plus possible COI makes me think deletion is the better option. Yamamura Sadako (talk) 20:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 08:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   16:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show they meet notability criteria. Fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.