Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear Nebraska


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 13:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Nuclear Nebraska

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable book. Does not seem to be the subject of notable awards, reviews, sales, etc. ScienceApologist (talk) 11:08, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 15:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added two reviews. -- Eastmain (talk) 15:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Book by major publishing house McGraw Hill, with foreword by US Senator Ben Nelson . Several reviews: . Johnfos (talk) 23:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Those two reviews are not reliable sources. California Bookwatch is not a generally recognized source of reliable reviews of academic material, and the othe resource is a organizational web page, not a published source at all. Having an introduction by a senator does not make a book notable. DGG (talk) 18:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I'd support a merge if there was a parent article about the proposed dump. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:51, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - It seems to be borderline notable to me. Res2216firestar 04:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strony Keep A fabouslous book that deserves an article on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaffyDuckDied (talk • contribs) 18:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:33, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability appears to be confirmed. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:50, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * confirmed by what? DGG (talk) 04:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.