Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear Politics in America (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Non-admin closure. D ARTH P ANDA duel 20:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Nuclear Politics in America
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable book. Not the subject of non-trivial reviews, sales, awards, etc. No evidence that it is anything more than a well-regarded textbook. Doesn't deserve its own Wikipedia article. ScienceApologist (talk) 11:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC) *Comment I'm pretty sure that well-enough-regarded textbooks are notable by dint of being well-enough-regarded. It would be well to check this. Nyttend (talk) 12:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of good, reliable sources exist: see those at the first deletion discussion. Nyttend (talk) 12:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added another review. -- Eastmain (talk) 18:42, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:RS. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as above, needs improvement not deletion. StarM  02:19, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy procedural close on the grounds the previous AFD closed with a SPEEDY KEEP decision only 2 months ago. Articles must not be renominated in such a short period of time if the previous AFD resulted in a keep. It jeopardizes the AFD system and can be accused of WP:IDONTLIKEIT, to boot (language such as "does not deserve..." as used by the nom makes it sound such). 23skidoo (talk) 15:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep this one has actual reviews. DGG (talk) 17:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.