Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear War MUD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Go  Phightins  !  15:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Nuclear War MUD

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources such that we could write a dedicated encyclopedia article on the topic without resorting to original research. Its only coverage is in passing. These are the sources with print mentions:. The topic had no substantive additional analytical coverage in Google Books, Google Scholar, or a custom Google search of video game sources.There are no worthwhile redirect targets, as our List of MUDs only lists games with their own articles. czar 07:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  czar  07:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Citations to Yahoo! Wild Web Rides and Internet Virtual Worlds Quick Tour meet WP:GNG. Czar appears to have overlooked the Yahoo! Wild Web Rides cite in preparing the AfD. I consider calling the Internet Virtual Worlds Quick Tour material "in passing" to be a mischaracterization. The Yahoo! Wild Web Rides coverage is similar; both represent a coherent intention to cover the topic and provide information usable to support a small but informative article. —chaos5023 (talk) 14:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Both sources do not cover the topic in any substantive depth (significant coverage). It would be impossible to write an encyclopedia article that does justice to the topic based on the provided sources and no additional sources are forthcoming. czar  04:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

User talk:rhockens 17:27, 26 February 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I'll try to add some sources and additional information over the next few days in the hope of improving it enough to keep it. (I played here in the days when it was hosted at the Astrakan (?) Computer Club in Sweden. Thanks!
 * Delete per nom. The two print sources don't offer any substantial coverage on this game; ie there is nothing to write about for this. Namcokid  47  04:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I could not find any significant coverage and the citations already present are of little substance. GNG/NVG is not met. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 11:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  21:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  EN  - Jungwon  07:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Czar, I don't believe the GNG is met, and you can't write a sourced article to the few minor sources available. Sergecross73   msg me  18:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't find useful sources to support the notability of this very subject.Northern Escapee (talk) 09:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.