Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear japan

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 13:35, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Nuclear japan
This is just opinion, and already exists at List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons in a much better form Tompagenet 18:03, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete, as this is largely opinion and unencyclopedic material. If someone wants to explore it properly outside of the article noted above, it might belong under Japan. HyperZonk 18:20, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Brookie 18:38, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * No verifiable content whatever. And no compelling reason to fork. Delete. Uncle G 19:11, 2005 Feb 15 (UTC)
 * Delete. Part unverifiable content, part speculation. --Trip: The Light Fantastic 20:45, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Oleg Alexandrov 00:50, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete just an opinion piece. Johntex 02:46, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV essay, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 05:04, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just... not encyclopedic at all.  Looks like a bad essay IMHO. -- EmperorBMA|&#35441;&#12377; 18:48, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's just a rant. --LostLeviathan 03:06, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, i think its about time that someone got it right. The united states' stupid, bigoted idealogy keeps them from seeing that not EVERYone wants to be like them. That some countries absolutely loathe them. That maybe Japan has been hurt, and it has taken the sixty some years for them to start to retaliate. Now, someone has finally put a remark in, about this, and they have been cruelly turned down by many people, which are no doubt all american. Shame. Shame on all of you. Its a keep, definitely. ''-- This unsigned vote by BlackerNight
 * Delete; this might have been a keep if Wikipedia were a collection of op-ed essays. But since it isn't, there's nothing "cruel" about turning down something which didn't belong here in the first place.  Shame.  Shame on people who want to exploit Wikipedia as a soapbox. -- Antaeus Feldspar 03:08, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)