Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear research at Michigan Technological University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 00:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Nuclear research at Michigan Technological University

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability concerns. I'm tending towards week delete. I'm mostly listing to generate discussion. Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 00:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. 141.161.92.138 (talk) 00:59, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence that nuclear research performed at Michigan Technological University is in any way notable. Seems too specific to merit merging but if anyone wanted to merge and rd that'd be OK too. JJL (talk) 01:08, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as for almost all such cases. In fact, less noteworthy than usual, because based on the material in the article, it was a rather undistinguished program, which didn't even have its own research reactor, and where the emphasis wasn't of research in the first place. If some one wants to do an article, Nuclear research at the University of Chicago might be a more plausible topic. DGG (talk) 01:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per DGG.Nrswanson (talk) 01:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per DGG and WP:N. Tavix (talk) 01:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per DGG.Broadweighbabe (talk) 02:57, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —TerriersFan (talk) 18:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. X-ray machines, liquid scintillation counters, 137Cs, and 60Co are very common -- surely every research university with a science program has them. But I fully support similar articles for universities with larger, more interesting programs. CRGreathouse (t | c) 18:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.