Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nudadiha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  →TSU tp* 06:23, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Nudadiha

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No context or Information ♠♥♣Shaun9876♠♥♣  Talk Email 16:40, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The text at the time of nomination, "Nudadiha is an ideal village in the Kaptipada block of Mayurbhanj district.", provides not only enough context to identify the subject, but also to verify it's existence by following the search links above — Frankie (talk) 17:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep/Weak Delete If improvements can be made ok, but as it stands it sounds like it's promoting the village 'ideal village' and 'fulfils the educational needs' point to this. --Chip123456 (talk) 17:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * redirect to Mayurbhanj district, this is a classic unsourced "X is a village" entry. Could be kept with improvement, but these sorts of entries are rarely improved. Hairhorn (talk) 21:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 6 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Now a referenced stub with a basic level of sourced info on a geographical location. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:47, 6 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep – Per improvements by User:SpacemanSpiff (diff page), per Wikipedia's Five pillars, the encyclopedia also functions as a gazetteer, and per Notability (geography), an essay, but one that provides accurate context about prior consensus regarding geographic locations. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:57, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.