Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nude yoga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Nude yoga
This seems to be partly an advert for a yoga group in Manhatten, and partly a random list of people who have practised yoga in the nude. Its completely non-encyclopaedic in style, and I don't really see how what can be encyclopaedicly said about peforming yoga in the nude is more than a passage at most in the Yoga and Nudity in sport articles. Thryduulf 09:36, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as advertisement. As Thryduulf says, if there is anything important to be said about nude yoga, it can be said in existing articles. –Sommers (Talk) 09:41, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as advert and unencyclopedic. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 09:52, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete  This article does not seem to be about more than a single group of nude yoga enthusiasts and not really enought for an encyclopedia article.  Martin-C 14:04, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It's an ad. There's no place for it here. -- † Ðy§ep§ion † 19:04, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as ad. --Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 19:23, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Vanispamadbertcruftgarbagedisposalunitthrowitoutorwhatevertheflavorofthemonthforcomplaintsare Avi 20:56, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; Adv, Strip it down  Celcius    (Talk)  [[Image:Flag_of_Denmark.svg|18px|]] Wiki be With us! 23:01, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Super Strong Delete this nonsense/garbage/bad joke.Blnguyen 00:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN seems to be the right place. Stifle 10:00, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment -- seems to be a real phenomenon -- one of the altweeklies in Boston did an article on it a couple of months ago. On the other hand it seems to be very sub rosa. More research may be called for. Haikupoet 04:22, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * DELETE NOW, BETTER ARTICLE NOW EXISTS: naked yoga This page now has no essential info that the naked yoga page doesn't now have, Dandelion1 00:08, 12 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.