Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nue Money


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete Article was a copy paste of Cali Swag District with some words changed. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:29, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Nue Money

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This was copied, with changes, from long-standing article Cali Swag District along with that article's references. Artist doesn't appear to be notable - Google finds Youtube and other video sites, Myspace, Twitter and Facebook but no reliable sources. Nothing on Google news. Speedy deletion contested. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Not contested: declined. I came upon it while deleting CSDs, and it plainly didn't qualify for the G3 (hoax) deletion for which it was tagged.  Nyttend (talk) 00:28, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply That's why i brought it here; I'd have gone for db-band if the doner article's references weren't there. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Take out what belongs to Cali Swag District and you are left with an article worthy of a db-band deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. CSD G3 (hoax) "includes blatant and obvious misinformation" and this page is clearly based on misinformation. That's why I applied the speedy deletion in the first place. Add to that CSD A7. De728631 (talk) 01:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * G3 I don't see how patently obvious wrong chart positions don't qualify as blatant hoaxing... Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 00:19, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.