Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Null hypothesis significance testing debate

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Carrp | Talk 01:54, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Null hypothesis significance testing debate

 * Delete. Looks like a poorly written high school essay. Oleg Alexandrov 01:14, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete … or worse. Paul August &#9742; 02:32, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsalvageable. -- Rbellin|Talk 02:40, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete This s not a kind of essay!? (PISA?) --NewAtair &#916; 12:43, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Turns a simple concept into a rambling cranky POV hash not suitable for addition to the Null Hypothesis page. I believe he was talking about the debate in psychology... maybe. Jok2000 13:33, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article is indeed written in the form of an essay and it does not even attempt to explain what the debate is about. Jitse Niesen 14:57, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As noted on the discussion page, this is not notable, it contains nothing new, what is does contain is of dubious merit, it is not NPOV and the transcript of the discussion page suggest that the author herself attempted to delete it only be thwarted by a gallant revert. Let us allow the author her wish for oblivion for this article.Velela 20:09, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unwikified original research. Jonathunder 00:51, 2005 Mar 5 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.