Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nullium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's vandalproof page &#x260E;  ) 06:05, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Nullium
Non-existent element. It's been speedied before (sans infobox), but I don't think it quite qualifies. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 23:49, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Should Neutronium also be nominated? The only real difference is that Neutronium makes it clear that it is fictional.  But Nullium could be edited to do the same. Descendall 00:43, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Neutronium, it's a widly (and generally consistently) used concept in sci-fi, also has some limited scientific credability although I'm too lazy to look up the references Astaroth5 08:23, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Delete the article doesn't assert any notability. - Bobet 02:26, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The difference between neutronium and nullium is that the former has actually been used in some science fiction works, The Atom comic book comes immediately to mind.  Jtmichcock 00:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, fiction, andjavascript:closeafd("delete", "")
 * Keep: this article is new, give it a chance to be added to for its notability to be asserted. It is not fiction: everything in the article is true, including the decay rate (see Free neutron). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.120.73 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * comment the only thing I've encountered in fiction with a name like nullium having 0 neutrons, 0 protons, 0 electrons, is "null matter" from the cartoon Shadow Raiders. 132.205.45.110 20:44, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fiction? Pseudoscience? Nonsense? Original research? In any case, unencyclopedic. MCB 07:06, 18 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.