Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NumXL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 00:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

NumXL

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. Mostly unreferenced; sources and massive farm of external links are only to the software provider's website. A search for better references turns up only sales and download links, and some user-generated content, nothing at all , or very brief, passing mentions. Also more than a bit promotional. Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Hyperbolick (talk) 04:15, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. I can't find dispassionate, reliable sources that discuss this in-depth.  Nice sales brochure!   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 05:00, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete – sources found and understood do not pass notability guidelines: (passing mention),  (non-independent),  (multiple passing mentions). Google Books & Scholar search turns up lots and lots of passing mentions in more technical works. UnnamedUser (talk) 03:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete since subject fails criteria for independent notability and also WP:NSOFT. This is no more than a promotional piece of text, which, in years previous, before more stringent measures were adopted, managed to masquerade as a Wikipedia article. An interesting fact: Τhe creator of the contested page, who's also its major contributor, has made few other contributions to Wikipedia in the space of ten years; has a user page that redirects to the NumXL. -The Gnome (talk) 13:32, 10 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.