Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Numb & Number


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  00:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Numb & Number

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Might juuust squak by NMUSIC6, but it's not clear Harrow is independently notable of sigh, and Kawashima redirects there. Unable to find evidence of coverage to meet GNG for this one off collaboration, nor identify a viable AtD. Star  Mississippi  20:06, 14 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Organizations.  Star   Mississippi  20:06, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete – Does not meet WP:GNG. While this may meet WP:MUSICBIO #6 as "an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians", my searches have found no coverage in reliable sources for this collaboration, and MUSICBIO does not guarantee notability, simply stating that topics may be notable if they meet some of the criteria there. North America1000 17:49, 29 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.