Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number 1's… and Then Some


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   boldly redirected Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Number 1's… and Then Some
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Only one source. Its single is in the Top 20, but I haven't been able to verify the track listing at all, leading me to think that the current tracklist is WP:OR/WP:CRYSTAL. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 23:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete the list of songs came from the only source, but it's not finalized yet. Anyway, this article should be deleted until more sources are found. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 00:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Why delete if it's going to be recreated eventually anyway? Redirect would be a much better idea, just like Ten Pound Hammer did with Justin Moore (album), which i finally found an official track listing on. Deleting it is pointless. This is like cutting hair, and it grows back. Ryanbstevens (talk) 01:36, 18 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Also, CMT now has the album listed. Ryanbstevens (talk) 02:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't object to a redirect. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 16:11, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination and Caldorwards4. Also, the album still has a while to go before being released. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 17:07, 18 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Again, just redirect, rather than delete. Deleting it is like cutting hair, which grows back, just like the album article will come back. The album will be released in less than two months, which is close enough to have an article. Ryanbstevens (talk) 17:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Dude...your hair must be real long. :) --Wolfer68 (talk) 02:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * My hair isn't that long. I'm just saying that deleting this category is similiar to cutting hair. (Maybe i'll put a picture of myself on my user page later, if that's allowed.) Ryanbstevens (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I've redirected it. That's the best solution. Trust me. Ryanbstevens (talk) 17:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I've added more sources. Please tell me that that will do something. Ryanbstevens (talk) 20:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete/redirect - A little referenced material here, but not enough... and the album release is pretty far off to be creating an article. And saying that just because "the album article will come back" doesn't change anything - its okay if it comes back in a few weeks when its become more notable, but as for now its not there yet. CloversMallRat (talk) 18:14, 19 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Why can't we just redirect? Ryanbstevens (talk) 19:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.