Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number 9 Audio Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I will place a copy of the article in Tylerbahlai's user space so that the article can continue to be improved. If sufficient sources to meet CORPORATIONS are found, the article can be restored. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  13:26, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Number 9 Audio Group

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:CORP. Failed prod. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by Tylerbahlai

I am having a hard time finding any more sources for this wikipedia entry to make it more legit. Since the studio has been in business for 25 years, a lot of the references (magazines, newspapers, etc...) that I would like to use simply have not made it online. I did reference a Canadian Musician magazine article, however, and will endeavour to find more articles/listings in well-established, published resources.

What other resources can I use to further verify the studio? I will try to find more quickly, as I have no desire for this page to be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tylerbahlai (talk • contribs) 19:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If you know the exact source information, you may add those sources as references. Verifiability does not exclude offline sources that otherwise meet Wikipedia's criteria. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:33, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

I have added two new references, including an article published in The Toronto Star way back in the day (1993). Is this enough to keep the entry afloat? I will add more offline published sources later, I just need to find them first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tylerbahlai (talk • contribs) 19:57, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, none of the references do anything to establish notability per WP:CORP. Searching finds nothing significant either. Sure it exists, but there is nothing to show why it is notable.   Esradekan Gibb    "Klat" 14:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Do not delete yet I found an episode of Much Music's disBAND where the studio is featured, and have added a reference to it in the article. The reference links to the episode page, where you can watch video clips of the episode. Will look for more references. Tylerbahlai (talk) 18:42, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Tylerbahlai  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- ( X!  ·  talk )  · @076  · 00:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete NN - sources are all incidental mentions, so fail WP:CORP Jonathan Hall (talk) 20:09, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: The company only has trivial mentions. Fails WP:CORP. Joe Chill (talk) 00:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.