Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number ones of European Hit Radio Top 40 (1995)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Number ones of European Hit Radio Top 40 (1995)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete These are just listings of songs based on listener voter tallies/requests [according to the article European Hit Radio Top 40, which I redirected to European Hit Radio (which itself has neutrality issues)] --Wolfer68 (talk) 00:27, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Adding comment that these are unofficial charts no different than a radio station's most requested songs of the week. Non-encylopedic and probably WP:IINFO. --Wolfer68 (talk) 07:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:


 * Delete- Per nom, useless list. Lets  drink  Tea  00:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom  §hawn poo   01:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom, try changing it into a category instead.  Math Cool  10  Sign here! 05:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all: impractical lists of an unofficial chart. JamesBurns (talk) 05:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep No compelling rationale for deletion has been advanced, and it's particularly important to have one in giant bundle-deletions like this. Townlake (talk) 05:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete these are effectively "Lists of songs played on Radio Station x (year y)" and as such are each non-encyclopedic as both an "indiscriminate collection of information" (WP:IINFO) and a "Non-encyclopedic cross-categorization" (WP:NOTDIR). All articles should therefore be deleted per the content policy WP:NOT.--Rogerb67 (talk) 15:37, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  —Cunard (talk) 22:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.