Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Numbers In Action


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Snow keep. Sources have been added, establishing the subject's notability. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  17:37, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Numbers In Action

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable, per WP:GNG Σ Α Π Φ (Sapph) Talk 19:59, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Logan Talk Contributions 21:25, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge to 100% Publishing, the album. -- Whpq (talk) 20:54, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the album. --Legis (talk - contribs) 00:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Easily meets the GNG. Coverage includes Song of the Day at NPR, single review at Pitchfork , at the NME , at FACT, , at This Is Fake DIY , at Drowned in Sound . Director's Cut feature about the video at Pitchfork, , one of Drowned in Sound's Videos of the Year , winner of Best New Director and Best Urban Video at UK VMAs .  86.44.31.213 (talk) 21:04, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ankit Maity   Talk •  contribs 16:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 14:40, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per significant coverage found by 86.44.x.x.  HurricaneFan 25  —  15:00, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per 86.44.31.213. Those look like fine sources.  Am I missing something?  Hobit (talk) 16:46, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I read the first two links, and yeah, that is notable coverage for this song.  D r e a m Focus  17:38, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of coverage with which the article can be improved. Clearly notable.--Michig (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.