Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Numerai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 04:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Numerai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a six month old hedge fund. The Financial Times source seems to be the only available independent source. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 01:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Finished Adding more independent resources Rolly Jodger (talk) 01:58, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Added more references. Just read that these references do not necessarily need to be added to the article to establish notability, so feel free to remove spurious references. The Financial Times and CrunchBase are editorial, clearly trustworthy, and should be enough? If AFD-requester or anyone can restate their notability concerns then please post them here or on my talk page. If there is anything else I can do to make the article better, please post that too. Rolly Jodger (talk) 03:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep User:Rolly Jodger, User:MrX, I'm not completely convinced that it's notable, but it seems notable enough for a Wikipedia article. The article needs work, the writing isn't very good. The Platypus of Doom (talk) 11:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete A case of WP:TOOSOON, I think. I'm fine with it being moved into Draft: or User: space: It's possible that substantial coverage will appear in reliable sources independent of the FT, but who knows? WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL. Cheers! Talk to SageGreenRider 12:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as clearly too soon, not nearly a year old and there's not enough imaginably of course. SwisterTwister   talk  07:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 14:41, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are something on the order of 10,000 hedge funds in existence.  The truly notable ones have been around a long time and hold assets measuring well in excess of $1 billion.  Here, the subject holds 1.5 million (not billion), which the article says was raised just last month.  The modeling contests that they sponsor do seem interesting, but I don't see it as enough to get the subject past the notability criteria.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.