Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nur Nabi Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was DELETE. TigerShark 13:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Nur Nabi Khan

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable army officer from Bangladesh. His claims to fame seem to be a medal (third-level gallantry), imprisonment for a coup attempt (1-year sentence, so probably not a leader), and author (no verification & lots of retired officers write a book or two). Article has been tagged for notability since November. No relevant Google hits that I can see, so I say delete. Mereda 17:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of military affairs-related deletions.   -- Mereda 17:31, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletions.   -- Mereda 17:31, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - Doesn't look all that notable at the moment; however, if someone adds the titles of the books, together with assertions of their significance, I would change my view. Probably borderline for inclusion. Walton monarchist89 17:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - It's pretty clear an adequate article could be made about him. Do you have to lead a coup to be notable?  I missed WP:COUP.  Johnbod 23:23, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * weak deleteI don't think there would be sources to say much more. Find some.DGG 01:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any sources on google - I can't even find proof that he exists. The coup wasn't successful, I can't find his books. Completely fails WP:BIO.  Ultra-Loser  [ T  ] [  C  ]  03:04, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.