Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nura Woodson Ulreich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Dane2007 (talk) 06:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Nura Woodson Ulreich

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Single book entry on wikipedia related to artist; notability not significant enough for her own page. Suggest deletion and/or merging content with All_Aboard,_We_Are_Off. Dane2007 (talk) 03:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. The artist isn't known for just one book. Her art and murals have been subject to acclaim in addition to her work as an illustrator. If anything, content of All_Aboard,_We_Are_Off should be merged to the artist's page. I think the two deserve separate entries, but deleting the artist but leaving a work of hers seems to be the wrong way around. Plandu (talk) 03:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep I added numerous references. Back in the 1930-1950 period I think she may have been well-known. There are mentions of her paintings, carpet deisgns, illustrations and books in Google books. She appears in old "Who's Who" listings often enought that it was easy to find her basic bio information, 70 years down the line. She had a short article in TIME magazine. That was huge back then. I think the many mentions in Google books makes her anotable artist of that time, and of course notability is not temporary. Merits her own page. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 04:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I've now added over 20 references, which were not that hard to find. I also turned up four permanent collections with her work, three of which are major institutions: San Diego Museum of Art, the Smithsonian American Art Museum and the Walker Art Center. See page for specifics. The collections mean she automatically meets notability via point 4 of WP:ARTIST. Dane2007, I think it might be time to withdraw or close this nomination, to save some time.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 05:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.