Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuremberg Diary

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Stormie 09:54, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

Nuremberg Diary
Book review with no context. And nothing links to it. --Woohookitty 23:57, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Abstain for now Weak Delete. As it stands it looks like a POV promo/advertisement for the book. Searching through Amazon.com, this article appaers to have been lifted word for word off Cody Carlson's book review page . Unless anon user 207.46.125.17 is Cody Carlson, this is possibly a copyright violation/plagiarism. Megan1967 23:18, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Vote changed to weak delete as per above. Megan1967 01:59, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV, ad, possible CopyVIO, non-notable. Jayjg  (TALK)]] 20:17, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)