Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nurse jones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Deleted per WP:CSD notability. Pedro : Chat  22:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Nurse jones

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Sorry, but Wikipedia is not for memorials. Little assertion of notability. The only external link relates to a different Nurse Jones. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 14:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, with deepest sympathies to the family. Unfortunately, the article really doesn't meet Wikipedia's policies, including Verifiability and reliable sources. If there were articles or news coverage on the subject that might prove her notability, then those sources should be referenced in the article. ZZ Claims~ Evidence 15:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete article created by spa. As noted by nom, the link provided (hosted by BBC, user submitted content) is a poem by a "grateful patient of nurse Ethel Lydia Jones", the article is putatively about "Ian'a Jones".  Article says she's survived by two sisters, one of whom is "Iwan Heil Jones", after dropping the odd middle name, a couple of "Iwan Jones" turn up on google search, all men.  Googling "Nurse Jones" results in porn hits, googling "Ian'a Jones". results in hits for "Ian A. Jones"es.   Claims about contributions unsupported, delete as failing WP:V. Pete.Hurd 18:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Would hedge an A7, but there's some notability assertion in there (service notes, though I'm not sure that's valid).  Deepest condolences to the family, but regretfully, we're not an obit site.  Sorry. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Photo on article is unsourced and no licensing information - but appears to be a man's face poorly photoshopped onto a nurse's body. I presume this whole article is a subtle practcal joke at someone's expense. Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk to me)  16:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * ...come to think of it, you're right. My !vote stands, but now as a hoax. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.