Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nurul Nuha Anwar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  02:46, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Nurul Nuha Anwar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Ostensibly the article is a biography, but it is really a WP:COATRACK for a political party. There are sources, yes, but the sources are part of the coatrack. Prominent in the article is the line "There has been a lot of rumors circulating especially in the blogosphere that Nurul Nuha will be contesting the Nibong Tebal seat for next election." Wikipedia is not a place to propound rumours, nor to agitate for some sort of political result. The person is not notable. Rumours and counter rumours do not make the person notable.

It is not even worth redirecting to the political party. There is no substance here. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 26 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete She fails WP:POLITICIAN and the article consists mostly of rumor and speculation, which makes it a violation of our policy on biographies of living people.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  20:34, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 26 March 2013 (UTC)


 *  Delete Disqualify - Just pure rumors and coatracking. As much as I've never been a big fan of the policy, this is the reason why we have WP:BLP. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:28, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * please clarify what you mean by disqualify? It is not a traditional comment on a deletion discussion. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 10:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It's a pun. It's referring to the fact that she's a politician. I do it occasionally. As you can see in my edit summary, my !vote is actually delete. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:36, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Many thanks. I suspect not all closers of AfDs go deeper than the material on the page. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 07:50, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.