Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutrient testing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Nutrient testing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Current sourcing is non-WP:MEDRS-compliant, consisting primarily of naturopathy practitioners. Searches did not return sufficient reliable-source coverage to establish notability. –dlthewave ☎ 12:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 12:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Note: I've removed copyvio from four different sources from the page, which was already short (five sentences), so there's not much left there now; if it's to be kept it will need to be completely rewritten. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:59, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, not really a notable concept as such. Not seeing any sources call micronutrient testing "nutrient testing", so I don't think we can salvage this article. – Thjarkur (talk) 18:15, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Of course there are lab tests for nutrients, but "nutrient testing" is not really a coherent concept as the indications for the tests and the methods used vary widely. This article seems to be referring to some sort of extensive panel ordered by naturopaths but I am unable to find any WP:MEDRS sources that discuss this (or even WP:RS sources). The sourcing is incredibly poor. Spicy (talk) 14:07, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: per all of the above Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.