Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutter McClennen & Fish


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Nutter McClennen & Fish

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article contains only PROMO and Original Research. There is no salvageable content on the page. CorporateM (Talk) 14:16, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Was the firm founded in 1879 by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis and his Harvard Law School classmate Samuel D. Warren? If so, it would appear to be a highly notable firm. Candleabracadabra (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:14, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clearly notable for its history, and probably notable for its current activities although that will take more digging to separate the reliable sources from the promotional chaff.  I've added a few sources, and more on-line and off-line sources are available as shown by GBooks and Google searches. The promotional stuff can be cleaned up as we have done with many other articles about notable law firms. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:07, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Arxiloxos. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.