Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nyas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 18:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Nyas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a very old, unsourced orphan article that doesn't make a lot of sense. Nominally about an element of Hindu philosophy, the only "reference" is a coincidental use from Shakespeare, where the word refers to a bird (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/eyas). Googling the "types of nyas" listed just turns up Wikipedia mirrors. I think this is just nonsense, but bring it here in case this is recognizable as an English-language/transliteration issue. Opabinia regalis (talk) 10:03, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Sam Sing! 14:43, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- Sam Sing! 14:43, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete -Agreeing with nominator, the article doesn't either make sense to me. Anyway, it fails WP:GNG. I'm open to amend my !vote if someone is able to find "sources" and fix the article to make it reach the GNG standard. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  20:07, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - In an attempt to find sources I also tried to google some of the types it gives, with no luck. I'm finding a few more hits for nyas yog and a few other similar terms but none are specifically what's being talked about here. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 04:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. VandVictory (talk) 01:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.