Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nyhus Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Nyhus Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Citations give the appearance that the article is well-sourced, whereas a deeper investigation shows that they are just brief mentions, trivial rankings/awards, a press release, routine executive appointments announcements, and minor local coverage. A search in the leading trade magazine reveals only similar sources (routine executive appointments, etc.) According to O'Dwyers they have only 19 employees. A 19-person PR firm would have to do something pretty unusual/rare to gain notability.

Article is hopelessly promotional, such that even if they were notable, it would be better to start-fresh. CorporateM (Talk) 13:55, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (jive)  @ 20:44, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (witter)  @ 20:44, 26 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete In 2011 I commented on problems with this article. Nothing has changed. None of the sources establish notability. Nothing in the article's content establish notability. No attempt is made to meet any of Wikipedia's inclusion criteria.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  01:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete (What's with all the PR companies needing Wikipedia pages? Anyway...). Nominated Seattle Post Globe by same user for AfD.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 18:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Reads like an ad (surprise!). Company does not appear notable. -- Calidum  05:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.