Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nyleen Kay Marshall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Nyleen Kay Marshall

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

2 Google news links, and not much else other than forum links and missing poster-type links exist. I don't think this subject is notable for an encyclopaedia. Russavia Dialogue 10:07, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  --  J mundo 14:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions.  --  J mundo 14:40, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep-- The case was featured on a national TV show and RS are available, enough to meet our general notability guideline. -- J mundo 14:46, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – My heart goes out to the family, but sorry to say delete for two main reasons reasons. One, no real national, or even regional coverage, other that one mention on Unsolved Mysteries and one local newspaper article, as shown here on a Google News search .  Two, this would also fall under One Event. As it states: “…Wikipedia is not a newspaper. The bare fact that someone has been in the news does not in itself imply that they should be the subject of an encyclopedia entry”.  Thanks. ShoesssS Talk 19:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Textbook case of WP:BLP1E. Kevin (talk) 22:42, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - For the same reason I previously tagged the article with a PROD: Per Articles about people notable only for one event. Reliable sources only appear to talk about this person with regards to her disappearance.--Rockfang (talk) 02:18, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.