Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nyleptha Roberts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 19:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Nyleptha Roberts

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Prodded by David in DC: "Trivia, Fails WP:GNG, practically no reliable sources, WP:NOT". Also found at talk: "Only TWO Ghits, and ZERO Gnews hits. That smacks of non-notability. ArcAngel (talk) 03:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC)", which has never been addressed. I add that due to issue advocacy "Nyleptha Roberts" also gets bare list-mention in five other WP articles, which is quite excessive for the single perhaps-RS and the single inaccessible care-center writeup. Only notability is being verified to live to 112, and per developing consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World's Oldest People, we don't need articles on every verified 112-year-old, lists are fine. More reasons happily provided as necessary; Ryoung122 deprodded on seventh day, ah well. JJB 17:15, 15 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Taken from my edit summary when I put up PROD: At time of death she was the oldest living person in Tennessee, the 9th oldest living person in the US, and 20th oldest living person in the world? So what? WP:GNG. Almost no reliable sources. Hobby stub cruft. David in DC (talk) 17:41, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per User:David in DC. Her section at List of American supercentenarians should be plenty enough.142.207.79.205 (talk) 21:50, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mainly per David in DC... I'm not seeing the type of coverage that would satisfy the guidelines at WP:N. Canadian   Paul  06:34, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to list of American supercentenarians, id still like the grg's opinions on this article though. Longevitydude (talk) 14:41, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.