Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nylon (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. extransit (talk) 04:29, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Nylon (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

non-notable magazine, no third-party sources to establish notablity. Yworo (talk) 21:47, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Magazine is very well known and sold worldwide. --neon white talk 22:09, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Then it should be trivial to find several independent reviews as required to show notability. Where are they? Yworo (talk) 22:13, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral leaning towards keep but find some reliable sources first from third-parties. Needs more notability to be established to be stable.--Dripping oil (talk) 22:42, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The magazine sees near-universal availability on most American newsstands and magazine racks. It is one of the lower-tier magazines, but it's still an important one among fashion conscious youths. However admittedly the commonness of the title word will frustrate searches which are usually a cinch with other titles.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 22:55, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. A very notable magazine. Here are some references that may help:  Interview with its publisher in the publication of the Magazine Publishers of America.  Article in Media Life Magazine documenting its nomination in 2001 for an award from the American Society of Magazine Editors.  I can find more if you require them. --Crunch (talk) 23:13, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Now has WP:RS sources about founding, and Crunch's external links, one as cite. --Lexein (talk) 01:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The above-cited references indicate that Nylon is in the company of some very well known (and unquestioned) publications with similar (100,000 to 400,000) circulation, such as Harper's, Mother Jones, Saveur and Texas Monthly&mdash;Roman Spinner (talk) 07:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 23 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - At least as of now has plenty of sources to establish notability. Rlendog (talk) 22:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep looks notable enough now.--Caravan train (talk) 19:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.