Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nymon lester


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Nymon lester

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Internet searches for "Nymon Lester" come up with nothing reliable. The Le Monde citation can't be easily verified (contradictory dates are given) and the Daily News link goes nowhere. Possibly a hoax? Michitaro (talk) 02:23, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 04:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. If this person exists they are doing a truly remarkable job of staying uder the radar. Judging by google hits which lead nowhere, I suspect a hoax.TheLongTone (talk) 07:48, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Should be considered, but needs more information. *I work for NYC Housing Authority. This name does indeed appear on a record back in the 1980's, but it's still on microfiche - it's not scheduled to be digitized for another 18 months.  (Record Locator #455.63.8777)  As well, a quick geneology search does show Lesters in Sussex, England with Alfred Jhon Lester indeed being born and having children, although I cannot find any of their names. Interestingly, there seem to be a number of students trying to find more information about Nymon Lester in the past 6 months.  Students from the UK as well as two students from Duke have posted questions on sites like ask.com wanting information about Nymon Lester.  In the questions they mention the mob and Hollywood connections, but it certainly is not a citation.jmann71 (talk) 20:01, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but Wikipedia is not the place for original research. Once these speculations have been proven and published in reliable, independent sources, then the article can be created. Michitaro (talk) 02:58, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy as hoax. Fitzhugh is misspelled and "Jhon" is a spelling of the Deep South, not Sussex. Source 2 is a picture of Britney Spears bald. Shii wouldn't give these a week even if funny. JJB 06:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete After the "microfiche" release, there still won't be grounds for an article; will there? At the present, the action that seems indicated is deletion. It may be a hoax; if not' it can be re-created. Stormbay (talk) 21:53, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Mentioned here as part of a hipotetical class assignment: http://blog.ecollege.com/WordPress/?p=1304 Zim (talk) 09:21, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as WP:HOAX (and a piss-poor effort at one, too). Plutonium27 (talk) 11:24, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.