Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nyrthos (the game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 19:42, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Nyrthos (the game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable RPG, currently in development which implies that it violates WP:CRYSTAL. Unsourced except for the given link to the game's site. Mediran talk to me! 13:16, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability, no references. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 17:04, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nominator, not notable --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:47, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete this isn't notable. Stowonthewolder (talk) 01:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Comment : The game has been receiving news coverage in reliable sources over the past year as it is apparently in closed beta.     . --Odie5533 (talk) 00:37, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and videogame-wikify. The coverage on Rock, Paper, Shotgun, as well as these from Game Insider, Gamers Only , Gameranx , and even Gamasutra are way enough to showcase the notability of the title. Also, WP:CRYSTAL does not apply for games that are currently in development, but for those who are not yet in development. —  Ṟ  Ṉ™  03:49, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The GamaSutra article is a press release, the Gameranx and Gamers Only do not appear reliable, but the Game Insider article does appear reliable. --Odie5533 (talk) 12:37, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Press releases count as reliable if published by Gamasutra :) The other two, I have my doubts, but they count for the coverage thing... — Ṟ  Ṉ™  18:19, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Another one from The Indie Games Magazine' . — Ṟ  Ṉ™  23:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:13, 6 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - The sources Odie5533 provided show notability for the article and with those sources it meets the general notability guideline. - SudoGhost 10:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, now meets WP:Notability (video games). — Theo polisme  22:17, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.