Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nyzette Cheveron


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Nyzette Cheveron

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm nominating simply because of the low amount of good sources with the current link now dead and unretrieveable at archive.org and I'm not finding any solid evidence of the listed book aside from this (which seems to be the new version of the dead link) and further searches found this and this. At best, this should be mentioned elsewhere as she may not be independently notable but there's no obvious target. Pinging author and possibly interested editor  (who wikified it a little). SwisterTwister  talk  06:45, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete as the only source for the article does not meet WP:RS. The content on the site was a blog, and has been shut down. Even if it were available it would not suffice.  Scr ★ pIron IV 19:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Searches turned up nothing to show they meet the notability criteria.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - she's mentioned here, but witches, their processes and their death penalties were run-of-the-mill at the time, and a mention in one book is not anough for an article here Kraxler (talk) 13:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.