Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nzboards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. – Avi 17:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Nzboards
Boardvertisement. Doesn't meet WP:WEB or WP:NOR. 135 active members. Alexa rank 476,313. Need I go on? (And don't forget to zorch the image, too.) &mdash;Lamentation ( 10:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; non-notable webpage--TBC TaLk?!? 11:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 11:11, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JPD (talk) 11:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nominator says it all. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  11:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. In addition, the prose is bad. WegianWarrior 12:04, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, has a list of active usernames for grod's sake. SM247 My Talk  01:37, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Further, that list doesn't appear to be terribly long. A search of an Australia New Zealand media database came up with no stories on this at all and it doesn't seem to meet any other criteria of WP:WEB. Capitalistroadster 02:08, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 02:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Avenue 03:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Avenue 03:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.