Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nzinga Malika Adams Jones

Vanity by new user. Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 16:41, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Of the worst kind. Someone give this chick a noogie for not following the BOLD FACE instructions regarding vanity pages.  Delete.  Please. - Lucky 6.9 16:43, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Vanity. Delete. DJ Clayworth 20:45, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Straight up vanity. At least this one looks like an encyclopedia article and not like some of the junk people try to post about themselves. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 06:26, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not vanity. anthony (see warning)
 * I think Cyr and anthony are saying the same thing here. I hope we start up a Wikifamily project soon, so there will be a place for articles like this. +sj +  18:43, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Actually what I'm saying is that we should keep these articles here, because they're not harming anything. anthony (see warning)
 * Delete, vanity. Are you serious, Anthony? This is one of the most straightforward vanity articles I've ever seen. &mdash;Stormie 04:25, Jun 27, 2004 (UTC)
 * Doesn't seem like vanity to me. This is useful historical information.  Needs to be wikied, but that's a job for cleanup. anthony (see warning)
 * Delete. --Gary D 08:53, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Let her register and move this to her User page. JamesMLane 06:46, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- pne 11:28, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: Yo, Anthony...this site is adding one server per month to keep up with the demand.  This would be fine in a "Wikifamily" project as suggested.  Why take up space with a person that is totally non-notable?  This is not, IMO, "useful historical information." - Lucky 6.9 18:23, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * there is no connection between needing extra servers and space - we are not short of disc space - disc space is cheap. Secretlondon 22:58, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - vanity - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  22:23, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)